{"id":57,"date":"2012-07-15T21:50:56","date_gmt":"2012-07-15T21:50:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/?p=57"},"modified":"2024-09-03T12:02:49","modified_gmt":"2024-09-03T11:02:49","slug":"more-mysteries-of-the-mysteries-of-london","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/2012\/07\/15\/more-mysteries-of-the-mysteries-of-london\/","title":{"rendered":"Hope – the real Mystery of London?"},"content":{"rendered":"

One thing about\u00a0G.W.M. Reynolds’s The Mysteries of London<\/em> that is impossible to question is that much of it is very visceral.<\/p>\n

Doesn’t the unflinching detail of\u00a0the murder of Polly by Bill while their children look on generate a physical reaction in the reader? It’s rapid but not glossed over so that Reynolds makes us see it in front of us. I am always nauseated while reading it, and afterwards when thinking of it. It makes me angry.<\/p>\n

Reynolds is using the technology of print to transport us to places, to make us witness to scenes, that our bodies might otherwise never experience. But it’s not a distant understanding – it’s not the experience of the city that the London Eye gives us. In such moments, technology does not mediate and distance us from the world, but\u00a0wounds<\/em> us, hurts us – but in thoughtful <\/em>ways that are very different from the wounds that, were we to witness these scenes in real life, would so traumatise us that we\u00a0couldn’t<\/em> think. Reynolds harnesses the technology of print to make us viscerally present and analytically distant at the same time.<\/p>\n

He uses the technology to transport us not only to the past but to another part of the city we couldn’t otherwise visit and be safe, and to other states of thinking and feeling.<\/p>\n

How does this tie in with what we discussed today?<\/p>\n

You heard about the technology and economics of the mass-circulation text, an example of which Reynolds’s\u00a0Mysteries of London <\/em>most certainly was. You heard how London was the most obvious place to produce and distribute such a text, but also how London can\u2019t be seen as an entity complete in itself: you heard a lot about Paris too, and how Reynolds was inspired by his life in Paris and by his knowledge of French literature, especially of Eugene Sue\u2019s phenomenally popular feuilleton, the \u00a0Myst\u00e8res de Paris<\/em>.\u00a0You also heard about other mysteries of other cities \u2013 New York, St Louis and others around the world. The Mysteries of London<\/em> is just one of many city mystery texts. \u00a0The French Myst\u00e8res <\/em>feeds into it and it in turn communicates with others, just as Victorian London was a city that existed not simply in itself but communicated with the world. London is the city of circulation, of coming and going, of paths, of adventures, of constant transformation, of multiple plots and multiple plottings, where identities as well as texts migrate and change. Movement, transport<\/em> is the process that defines this London.<\/p>\n

You also heard about Reynolds\u2019s involvement in politics. I particularly mentioned \u00a0Chartism and I stressed the politics of Chartism\u2019s interest in representation<\/em> both in terms of representation in government and in terms of representation of reality.<\/p>\n

The questions you <\/em>asked were as follows:<\/p>\n

\u2022What is the reason for the prologue? \u2022What is the reason for cross dressing? \u2022What happened to Eugene? \u2022Why focus on Wealth \/ Poverty? \u2022What is the origin of the writing style? \u2022What happens to Richard? \u2022How does this text represent London? \u2022How does the text end?<\/p>\n

I added queries about gender, economics and space, and we combined the questions to form 6 topics, one for me to answer (what happened to the characters) and 5 that you discussed: the prologue, gender, economics, style, space. The answers to all these cumulatively will answer more specifically your question about \u201cHow does \u00a0this text represent London\u201d.<\/p>\n

The prologue you said set up binaries in order to question them, perhaps deconstruct them, to show that Wealth \/ Poverty were not absolutes but rather a question of circulation. This notion is set up right away: the opening sentences narrate how \u201cCivilisation\u201d moved East to West \u2013 and so may well move on in the future, perhaps again further west to the US.<\/p>\n

Gender, we agreed, was a vexed category in The Mysteries of London<\/em>. It opens with a cross-dressing heroine who isn\u2019t condemned for her transgression. She gets into trouble not for her cross dressing but just because she happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Eliza theatrically feels the rain in the slums near Smithfield Market<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Gender is straight away shown as socially performative: Eliza is performing the part of Walter in public while her sex remains, in private for her, never in doubt. It\u2019s the city that enables such gender masquerade (and, indeed, masquerade in general). On a less liberating note, poverty in the city seems to brutalise and unsex mothers \u2013 as we see in the case of \u00a0Polly who intends to put the eyes out of her daughter with beetles. You had bigger problems in defining how the text defines masculinities \u2013 even though there are more men than women in the extract we read! But doesn\u2019t the same apply to men as to women? Don\u2019t we see men masquerading? Think of how the City Man Montague (= Eugene) takes advantage of the anonymity and constant circulation of the city to adopt an identity that is not his, to make money \u2013 and an identity – out of air.<\/p>\n

In terms of style, you noted the redundancy of the style, the padding. \u00a0I\u2019ve heard this before and your examples were very good but I\u2019m not entirely<\/em> convinced by how it’s the defining characteristic of the style: after all, the plots are swift moving and very ingeniously interlaced (even in the extracts you read, you saw Montague as Eugene, the wife-murdering Bill as one of the men who threw Eliza into the Fleet in chapter 1). \u00a0One of the most important experts on Reynolds, Anne Humpherys, reminds us that aspiring writers in the nineteenth century were advised to characterise like Dickens and plot like Reynolds (listen to the interesting BBC radio \u00a0documentary on Reynolds here: http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/podcasts\/series\/r3docs<\/a>). You also stressed the intense realism of the style. It\u2019s here that I want to return to the murder of Polly by Bill. Isn\u2019t the realism and the detail supposed to move<\/em> us \u2013 to shift our mental and emotional positions? Its investigative realism of the kind that it was possible to read in the newspapers at the time is a very specific kind of representation<\/em> of reality. It seeks to encompass all \u2013 from the luxurious boudoir in upper Clapton to the hell of Upper Union Court, from the polite language of the middle classes to the slang of the criminal underclasses. It seeks to represent all \u2013 just as the Chartists wanted everyone (well, all men) to be represented in Parliament. The style is in this sense democratic<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Space, we agreed, was heavily zoned into safe and unsafe areas. This applies as much to the bijou villa in Upper Clapton \u2013 the private boudoir where men don\u2019t go (unless they are helped by the technologies of Reynolds\u2019s writing and the illustrator’s burin) v. the public parlour where guests are received \u2013 as to the city at large. Eliza\u2019s big mistake is to get lost and wander into areas she shouldn\u2019t have been. She needed the technology of a map, just as Richard needed a moral compass – such as Reynolds’s own text is providing – to help him avoid the wiles of Mr Chichester and (a chapter we didn\u2019t read) of Mrs Arlington\u2019s \u201cSalon\u201d. Without technology, they are lost. You also pointed out the key difference between the suburbs and the centre of the city: the safety and health and space of the suburbs where the Markhams and Eliza have their dwellings v. the crowded centre where, even if as in the Park, the environment seems safe and attractive and natural, \u00a0moral corruption lies in wait just as bodies are threatened by disease and violence in the slums nearby.<\/p>\n

The question of economics I thought was the hardest question of all. What economics is Reynolds promoting? The answer was very well explained: free circulation of information and money. In other words, Reynolds promotes free trade, though not a dishonest form of it where trickery and deception are employed to ensure the greatest profit for a few. No: he\u2019s in favour of clear representation of what is put into circulation and how it is put into circulation. That ties up \u2013 perhaps bizarrely \u2013 to the emphasis on the representation of the underworld, including the sewer which was the Fleet at this time. Let\u2019s think of this in relation to Eliza and her alter-ego\u00a0Walter. At the end of chapter 3 s\/he does the morally correct thing: as \u201can unknown friend\u201d s\/he alerts the potential victim to the plot to rob him. In other words, she puts information into circulation. But before that, she herself has been thrown into circulation first by the storm into the narrative, and then by Dick and Bill who throw her into the Fleet Ditch \u2013 the sewer which leads out of the city into the Thames and death. In other words, they try to stop her circulating in the city. S\/he saves herself, however, and immediately \u2013 before the end of the chapter – starts circulating again. \u00a0Now isn\u2019t this what wicked greed is in the Reynolds \u00a0—\u00a0\u00a0the stopping of circulation, the arrest of flow and its transformation into accumulation?\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The idea is based on the Romantic priority of nature over culture, of the countryside over the city. \u00a0Economics in London should<\/em> be like the natural flow of pure water; instead, the\u00a0reality is a filthy sewer polluted and blocked by City Men, swindlers, gamblers and other criminals.<\/p>\n

What has this to do with London? Couldn\u2019t this apply to any city? Yes, of course. That\u2019s why, to cite the title of an excellent book edited by Celina Fox in 1992, \u201cLondon\u201d is a \u201cWorld City.\u201d Reynolds’s London stands for all <\/em>corruption, all <\/em>pollution, all <\/em>crime. And its realistic and democratic representation \u00a0may itself represent for us the hope of a different, better future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A summary of an interesting class on The Mysteries of London 15 July 2012<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,15],"tags":[29,39,47,57,67,105,107],"class_list":["post-57","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mysteries-of-london","category-victorian-popular-literature","tag-city-definition","tag-economics","tag-g-w-m-reynolds","tag-literary-london","tag-mysteries-of-london","tag-victorian-literature","tag-victorian-popular-literature"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16075,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57\/revisions\/16075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gre.ac.uk\/andrewking\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}